| (Bihar Times)The current state of affair in regards to JNNURM(Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal) projects   for Patna and Bodhgaya is very much disappointing. State has so far been able to   submit only nine DPRs(Detailed project report) out of which just one has been approved. Balance has been   returned for modification by the appraising authorities. Leading state in this   regard are Maharshtra with 143(56) DPRs , AP with 101(39) DPRs and Gujarat with   97(56) DPRs, Karnataka with 70 (42) DPRs. Figures in the brackets indicate   approved DPRs. Details of DPR submitted by Bihar is as given below along with   its status, date of last action and also the proposal size in the   brackets.   1. Development of roads of Patna Town (Returned for   Modification, 5/10/2006,   10614.72)                                                         2. Strengthening of drinking water supply system by   providing underground dedicated cable network (Returned for Modification,   5/10/2006, 4020.43)                                3. Drainage project of Patna Municipal Area (Returned for   Modification, 15/11/2006, 73153.3)                                                               4. Sewerage project of Patna Municipal Area (Returned for   Modification, 15/11/2006, 15280)                                                    
      
      
      5. Municipal Solid Waste Management for Patna town (Ist installment released,   8/5/2007, 7071.35, 3695.4),                                                       6. Storm Water Drainage system for Patna (Part I) Major   Drains (Returned for Modification, 19/04/2007, 8909.79)                                                        7. Water Supply system for Patna (Returned for   Modification, 19/09/2007, 30322),       8. Sewage collection and treatment system for Patna   (Returned for Modification, 25/10/2007,   29400.3),                                                              9. Rehabilitation of Strom Water Drainage System at   Kankarbagh (Returned for Modification, 4/1/2008, 4177.47) Barring the 36.95 crore amount for solid waste disposal,   no other project has been approved till date. This reflects badly on the   competencies of state administration once again.    Beyond these immediate happenings on JNNURM front there   is also a need for wide ranging re-look on states urbanization aspects. However,   most of the burden in this regard has to be shouldered by central government. If   central government is really worried about the large scale migration out of   Bihar to bigger cities, same cannot be said based on its programs till now.   Perhaps it is more concerned about the out migration only when it fails to   conform to the principle of use and throw.
        
  Only this can explain why there is continued discrimination   against Bihar in the matter of according priority in the development of basic as   well as institutional infrastructures.  This discrimination against   the state can be seen in the NHDP programs, can be seen in the national gas grid   plans too. Moreover, it is also evidenced in the location of economically   important institutions, be it the head offices of CPSUs (including banks) or be   it offices of regulatory bodies and nodal agencies not to mention the centers of   academic and research institutions. Furthermore even policy in regards to JNNURM   has done no justice to the state.      As a matter of fact, Bihar enjoys urbanization to the   extent of only 10% of population as against national average of close to 28%.   This figure is as high as 42% in states like TN and Maharashtra. Reason for this   low index of urbanization has something to do with lack of work opportunity in   the urban areas of state. Then there is also complete lack of any modern urban   amenities in the cities of the state. Problem is so acute that a lot of well off   people plan their post retirement life in the cozy environs of the metropolises   and bigger cities, than in the cities of the state.  These two   causes, viz lack of work opportunities and complete lack of any modern urban   amenities, can be primarily hold responsible for the observed low growth in   urbanization index of Bihar. While growth of cities in Bihar could be an important   element in checking out migration, it seems that neither the central government   nor the state government is worried about it. Even if one were to ignore failure   to create enough work opportunities around which these cities could have been   developed, one can hardly ignore the lack of sensitivity in developing the urban   amenities in the promising cities of the state. This brings us to the glaring   omissions of important cities of Bihar from the ambit of JNNURM.
        
  Central authorities, in their wisdom, chose not to consider   cities like Bhagalpur, Muzaffarpur and Darbhanga for JNNURM program. However,   what smacks of their complete insincerity towards the plight of state is their   decision to dissociate even Gaya from the JNNURM plan of Bodhgaya.    This has been the case notwithstanding the fact that quality urban   amenities will also help attract large- scale work opportunities.    There is an emergent requirement to develop the select   cities in the state to specific standards. For example if Patna needs to be   developed in a metropolis, the other cities like Muzaffapur, Gaya, Bhagalpur and   Darbhanga also need to be developed in the mega cities of tomorrow with   projected population of two to three millions. This could have been done by   bringing these cities under the ambit of JNNURM. Alternatively, state government   should come up its own plan and put these cities on par with JNNURM cities of   'B' type. Though at the moment Patna is also a 'B' category city under JNNURM,   all efforts should be made to promote it to the standard of category 'A'   cities. 
      
     Additionally, there is need to develop a good number of   cities in the state as industrial cities, each dependent on some specific type   of industry. A program should be drawn up on the kind of urban amenities which   would be required for these cities. These cities should be planned for projected   population size of around five lacs in the next 15 years. Development plan for   such cities should also factor in the intended industrial hub specific   requirements.  These cities along with the suggested type of   industrial clusters can be developed for the purpose as specified below.
        
       1. PCPIR- Barauni 2. Mechanical- Samstipur 3. Electrical- Madhepura, 4. Metal Processing, Foudry and   Forging-Bettiah, 5. Mineral Based Industry-Nabinagar, 6. Mechanical-Chapra 7. Automotive- Munger 8. Entertainment-Arrah 9. Civil Engg- Sasaram. 10. Textile- Kahalgaon 11. Leather & Jute- Katihar 12. Gems and Jewelry-Rajauli 13. Electronics Good-Jhajha 14.  Advance Technology-   Biharsharief   Yet another set of cities can be developed around the   agro based industry. These cities can be typically designed to have population   base of around two to three lacs.
        
  Amenities in these cities will have to be also planned in line   with their proposed business plans. These agro cities can be developed as the   hub of the following agro-based industries.   i.                     Paddy   processing: ii.                   Maize   processing:  iii.                  Makhana   processing iv.                 Fruit   Processing v.                   Honey   processing city vi.                 Potato   processing city vii.                Poultry   Industry viii.              Milk    Processing City ix.                 Cane   processing city- 
      
x.                   Jute processing city xi.                 Tea   processing city xii.                Vegetable   Processing xiii.              Vegetable   Oil xiv.              Spices ---------------------------------------------------------------*A Financial Sector Professional with over 11 years of   experience in various streams like Investment Banking, Financial Services and   Debt Market Operations. 
 
 comments... Very good   and detailed article. Instead   of just criticizing the government and state leaders,   the article details about growth and ideas of development. Thanks for Bihar Times for providing a medium where a   professionals and others who love their homeland   can share some ideas.  I would   request Bihar Times team to focus and publish   the "Good" work performed by citizens in Bihar region. This will motivate the people who are doing it and be inspiration for others also.  Dhiraj   Kumar Cognizant Technology   Solutions AGkumar.dhiraj@credit-suisse.com
   ----------------------------------------- 
    A Very nice article on important subject..other wise all the time it is   Lalu or Nitish. We had done many mistakes in past and should not repeat it.The government   need to have a detailed plan for the development of Each district. A growth can   only be seen and felt if all the places are growing. So in this aspect The effort   should start from TOP .There can be a Meeting of the IAS officers of all the   districts and Chiefminister can ask for a detailed development plan .It should   be a five year plan.The time line should not be more than 1 month.And after 1   month State Govt should see how to get it done.How much help they need from   centre.How much from bank. We have a system...so we should use.I doubt the resources are   inefficient.The system may  be.  Its an irony that if a ministers grand son gets kidnapped...All the IAS   offices SPs are made to stand in one line for their service.And right now the   state is dying.And people don't have time.   Kanti raikantikumar@gmail.com |